Abstract
Competent risk management is central to the ethical conduct and profitability of organisations including universities. Recent
UK research highlights the risks of physical and psychological harm and emotional distress for researchers and the importance
of developing strategies to deal with these issues prior to data being collected. Actual numbers of incidents of researcher
harm in Australian universities are unavailable; however anecdotal evidence and Bloor et al.’s (2010) case studies suggest that this is a significant issue. They recommended risk management practices such as training about
researcher safety, pre-trip security briefings, established call-back systems, working in pairs, and compulsory de-briefings
are recommended. Yet Australian universities do little to protect the safety of field researchers when they collect data in
private locations, such as participants’ homes and when dealing with emotionally challenging content. This is at odds with
the duty of care requirements on employers in current state based occupational health and safety (OHS) laws where breaches
attract considerable penalties. The failure to adequately address the potential safety hazards and manage the risks associated
with data collection places Australian universities in a vulnerable position, and possibly at risk of litigation, in their
duty to adequately protect researchers. The paper presents a review of the international literature and draws on the UK research.
Conceptual modelling is provided to illustrate the risk to universities if researchers are harmed in the field. Finally, the
paper concludes with a call for further research to develop robust policy and practice that protects the field researcher.
UK research highlights the risks of physical and psychological harm and emotional distress for researchers and the importance
of developing strategies to deal with these issues prior to data being collected. Actual numbers of incidents of researcher
harm in Australian universities are unavailable; however anecdotal evidence and Bloor et al.’s (2010) case studies suggest that this is a significant issue. They recommended risk management practices such as training about
researcher safety, pre-trip security briefings, established call-back systems, working in pairs, and compulsory de-briefings
are recommended. Yet Australian universities do little to protect the safety of field researchers when they collect data in
private locations, such as participants’ homes and when dealing with emotionally challenging content. This is at odds with
the duty of care requirements on employers in current state based occupational health and safety (OHS) laws where breaches
attract considerable penalties. The failure to adequately address the potential safety hazards and manage the risks associated
with data collection places Australian universities in a vulnerable position, and possibly at risk of litigation, in their
duty to adequately protect researchers. The paper presents a review of the international literature and draws on the UK research.
Conceptual modelling is provided to illustrate the risk to universities if researchers are harmed in the field. Finally, the
paper concludes with a call for further research to develop robust policy and practice that protects the field researcher.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-9
- DOI 10.1007/s10805-012-9159-2
- Authors
- Susanne Bahn, School of Management, Centre for Innovative Practice, Faculty of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
- Journal Journal of Academic Ethics
- Online ISSN 1572-8544
- Print ISSN 1570-1727