• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Introducing the WHOQOL-SRPB BREF: developing a short-form instrument for assessing spiritual, religious and personal beliefs within quality of life

Abstract

Purpose  

The aim was to develop and conduct preliminary testing of a short-form measure to assess spiritual, religious and personal
beliefs (SRPB) within quality of life (QoL).

Methods  

Existing data from the 132 items of the WHOQOL-SRPB (n = 5087) obtained in 18 cultures were first analysed to select the ‘best’ performing item from each of the eight SRPB facets.
These were integrated with the 26 WHOQOL-BREF items to give 34 items in the WHOQOL-SRPB BREF. A focus group of hospital chaplains
reviewed this new short-form. The WHOQOL-SRPB BREF was administered to a UK community sample (n = 230) either with an adapted WHOQOL-SRPB Importance measure or the SWBQ. A subset received both WHOQOL measures twice.

Results  

Completed in 8 mins, the WHOQOL-SRPB BREF was acceptable and feasible; Importance 5.5 mins. Good internal consistency reliability
was found overall (α = 0.85), for the SRPB domain (α = 0.83), and Importance (α = 0.90). Domains were moderately correlated.
Domain test–retest reliability was acceptable in both WHOQOL measures, except for SRPB Importance. Sleep was linked with religious
beliefs. Hope and wholeness were widely associated with non-spiritual facets. Factor analysis (maximum likelihood) of items
largely confirmed the WHOQOL domain structure, adding SRPB as a significant fifth domain. Internally, SRPB distinguished religious
from existential beliefs, and was validated by association with personal and transcendental well-being from the SWBQ.

Conclusion  

Preliminary evidence shows that the WHOQOL-SRPB BREF is sound for use in, and beyond health care. Extracted from a measure
already available in 18 languages, this short-form can be immediately used where such translations exist.

  • Content Type Journal Article
  • Pages 1-11
  • DOI 10.1007/s11136-012-0237-0
  • Authors
    • Suzanne M. Skevington, WHO Centre for the Study of Quality of Life, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
    • Keely Sarah Gunson, WHO Centre for the Study of Quality of Life, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
    • Kathryn Ann O’Connell, WHO Centre for the Study of Quality of Life, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
    • Journal Quality of Life Research
    • Online ISSN 1573-2649
    • Print ISSN 0962-9343
Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 07/30/2012 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice