Impact of Competing Values and Choices on Democratic Support in Hong Kong

This paper examines the reasons for the relatively low democratic support (DS) in Hong Kong in the context of competing values
and choices based on the previous Asian Barometer Surveys. In so doing, it establishes a three-factor theoretical model that
includes survey attitudinal statements related to authoritarianism (AU), nationalism (NA) and economic evaluations (EC) on
DS. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the analysis shows that the hypothesized model is a very good fit. The Hong
Kong people’s relatively low DS, in terms of their unconditional support for democracy and the degree of democracy they want
for Hong Kong, can be well explained by the three factors in combination. The factors have various extent of impact on DS,
with AU being the strongest, followed by EC, and then NA. The paper contributes by illustrating the usefulness of CFA in political
values research, unraveling the comparative importance of the values and choices in affecting DS, and establishing a model
for further testing.