Abstract
This article draws on concepts of trust to analyse recent policies affecting public/third sector relationships, examining
competition, ‘command and control’ mechanisms and the community turn in shaping cultures of relationships. Drawing on examples
from empirical studies in two English inner-city areas we explore ways in which power and controls exerted through dominant
organisational cultures and arrangements undermine independent approaches, innovation and organisational learning across sectors.
State bodies have taken trust in their actions as given while shifting responsibilities for service delivery and risks of
failure to others. We argue that increasing market cultures and regulation have damaged cross-sector trust promoting divisive
interests and risk-averse behaviours, restricting the local autonomy, innovation and community action presumed in the Big
Society agenda. We conclude by highlighting issues that need to be addressed to ensure future collaboration with community-based
providers; these include a focus on the processes and relational spaces which enable alternatives.
competition, ‘command and control’ mechanisms and the community turn in shaping cultures of relationships. Drawing on examples
from empirical studies in two English inner-city areas we explore ways in which power and controls exerted through dominant
organisational cultures and arrangements undermine independent approaches, innovation and organisational learning across sectors.
State bodies have taken trust in their actions as given while shifting responsibilities for service delivery and risks of
failure to others. We argue that increasing market cultures and regulation have damaged cross-sector trust promoting divisive
interests and risk-averse behaviours, restricting the local autonomy, innovation and community action presumed in the Big
Society agenda. We conclude by highlighting issues that need to be addressed to ensure future collaboration with community-based
providers; these include a focus on the processes and relational spaces which enable alternatives.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Paper
- Pages 1-24
- DOI 10.1007/s11266-012-9302-0
- Authors
- Linda Milbourne, School of Social Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
- Mike Cushman, Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
- Journal Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
- Online ISSN 1573-7888
- Print ISSN 0957-8765