Abstract
Use in criminological research of observation, semi-structured interviewing, and analysis of personal documents has been commonplace
for more than a century. These research techniques can be employed to develop and test theoretical explanations and to examine
the process of policy implementation. This paper briefly explicates how they were used in studies of the decision making and
criminal careers of street-level thieves and hustlers, to test theoretical notions about the delegitimantion effects of white-collar
crime, and to examine the implementation of a crackdown campaign by Australian tax authorities direct at crash transactions
in the small building and construction industry. Investigations may profit, however, from awareness of recurrent challenges
in the use of ethnographic methods before launching research of this type.
for more than a century. These research techniques can be employed to develop and test theoretical explanations and to examine
the process of policy implementation. This paper briefly explicates how they were used in studies of the decision making and
criminal careers of street-level thieves and hustlers, to test theoretical notions about the delegitimantion effects of white-collar
crime, and to examine the implementation of a crackdown campaign by Australian tax authorities direct at crash transactions
in the small building and construction industry. Investigations may profit, however, from awareness of recurrent challenges
in the use of ethnographic methods before launching research of this type.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-7
- DOI 10.1007/s12103-012-9160-8
- Authors
- Neal Shover, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
- Journal American Journal of Criminal Justice
- Online ISSN 1936-1351
- Print ISSN 1066-2316