Abstract
Income is regarded as one of the clearest indicators of socioeconomic status and wellbeing in the developed world and is highly
correlated with a wide range of outcomes. Despite its importance, there remains an issue as to the best way to collect income
as part of surveys. This paper examines differences in how income is collected in a nationally representative UK birth cohort,
the Millennium Cohort Study, looking at variations by questions asked and by respondent characteristics before then examining
the implications different methods of collecting and reporting income may have for measuring poverty. Results show that less
than a third of respondents give consistent information on income between measurement tools. Using multiple questions is associated
with a substantially lower response rate but this method generally results in a higher estimate of family income than using
a single question. This is particularly true for certain groups of the population—those on means tested benefits, in self-employment
and in part-time employment. Not surprisingly then in our analysis of poverty, using a single question produces an inflated
proportion of families who could be classified as living in poverty and is less associated with other measures of financial
deprivation than the more conservative poverty measure based on multiple questions.
correlated with a wide range of outcomes. Despite its importance, there remains an issue as to the best way to collect income
as part of surveys. This paper examines differences in how income is collected in a nationally representative UK birth cohort,
the Millennium Cohort Study, looking at variations by questions asked and by respondent characteristics before then examining
the implications different methods of collecting and reporting income may have for measuring poverty. Results show that less
than a third of respondents give consistent information on income between measurement tools. Using multiple questions is associated
with a substantially lower response rate but this method generally results in a higher estimate of family income than using
a single question. This is particularly true for certain groups of the population—those on means tested benefits, in self-employment
and in part-time employment. Not surprisingly then in our analysis of poverty, using a single question produces an inflated
proportion of families who could be classified as living in poverty and is less associated with other measures of financial
deprivation than the more conservative poverty measure based on multiple questions.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-22
- DOI 10.1007/s11205-011-9976-5
- Authors
- Kirstine Hansen, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Department of Quantitative Social Science, Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL UK
- Dylan Kneale, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Department of Quantitative Social Science, Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL UK
- Journal Social Indicators Research
- Online ISSN 1573-0921
- Print ISSN 0303-8300