Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM–IV: Parent Version (ADIS–P) is a valid diagnostic tool for the assessment of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) in youth. Although
there is considerable evidence that the ADIS–P is effective in diagnosing anxiety disorders in youth, no studies have yet
examined its validity in assessing ODD. In contrast, a number of studies support the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children–Version
IV (DISC–IV) as a reliable and valid tool in the assessment of ODD. In the present study, the ADIS–P and DISC–IV ODD modules
were administered in a counterbalanced order to the parents of a clinical sample of 106 children between 7 and 14 years of
age referred for the treatment of ODD. It was hypothesized that the ODD module of the ADIS–P would be valid as determined
by its concurrent and convergent validity with the DISC–IV, the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Aggression
and Conduct Problems scales, and the Disruptive Behavior Disorders rating scale (DBD). Results demonstrated that ADIS–P ODD
diagnoses had moderate agreement with DISC–IV ODD diagnoses (κ = .46, p < .001) and that Pearson correlations of ADIS symptom counts with questionnaire scales were similar in magnitude with correlations
of DISC–IV symptom counts with the same questionnaires. Overall, findings suggest that clinicians and researchers can use
the ADIS–P as an empirically-supported diagnostic interview for assessing children’s oppositional problems.
there is considerable evidence that the ADIS–P is effective in diagnosing anxiety disorders in youth, no studies have yet
examined its validity in assessing ODD. In contrast, a number of studies support the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children–Version
IV (DISC–IV) as a reliable and valid tool in the assessment of ODD. In the present study, the ADIS–P and DISC–IV ODD modules
were administered in a counterbalanced order to the parents of a clinical sample of 106 children between 7 and 14 years of
age referred for the treatment of ODD. It was hypothesized that the ODD module of the ADIS–P would be valid as determined
by its concurrent and convergent validity with the DISC–IV, the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Aggression
and Conduct Problems scales, and the Disruptive Behavior Disorders rating scale (DBD). Results demonstrated that ADIS–P ODD
diagnoses had moderate agreement with DISC–IV ODD diagnoses (κ = .46, p < .001) and that Pearson correlations of ADIS symptom counts with questionnaire scales were similar in magnitude with correlations
of DISC–IV symptom counts with the same questionnaires. Overall, findings suggest that clinicians and researchers can use
the ADIS–P as an empirically-supported diagnostic interview for assessing children’s oppositional problems.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-9
- DOI 10.1007/s10862-012-9294-5
- Authors
- Scott R. Anderson, Department of Psychology, Child Study Center, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA
- Thomas H. Ollendick, Department of Psychology, Child Study Center, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA
- Journal Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
- Online ISSN 1573-3505
- Print ISSN 0882-2689