Abstract
Demoralization is a commonly observed feeling state that is characterized by a sense of loss of or threat to one’s personal
values or goals and a perceived inability to overcome obstacles toward achieving these goals. Demoralization has features
in common with burnout and may precede or accompany it. Psychiatrists working in many mental health care organizational settings,
be they in the public or private sectors, may be at particular risk for demoralization. This is due partly to stressors that
threaten their own professional values because of factors such as programmatic cut backs, budgetary reductions and changing
social emphases on the value of mental health treatments. They also may be at risk for demoralization because of the effects
on them of the governance styles of the agencies in which they are employed. The leadership or governance style in large organizational
settings often is authoritarian, hierarchical and bureaucratic, approaches that are antithetical to the more participative
leadership styles favored by many mental health professionals in their clinical activities. Clinical leaders in mental health
organizations must exhibit various competencies to successfully address demoralization in clinical staff and to provide a
counterbalance to the effects of the governance style of many agencies in which they are employed. Appropriate leadership
skills, sometimes too simplistically termed “social support”, have been found to reduce burnout in various populations and
are likely to lessen demoralization as well. This paper reviews these important leadership issues and the relationship of
social support to recognized leadership competencies.
values or goals and a perceived inability to overcome obstacles toward achieving these goals. Demoralization has features
in common with burnout and may precede or accompany it. Psychiatrists working in many mental health care organizational settings,
be they in the public or private sectors, may be at particular risk for demoralization. This is due partly to stressors that
threaten their own professional values because of factors such as programmatic cut backs, budgetary reductions and changing
social emphases on the value of mental health treatments. They also may be at risk for demoralization because of the effects
on them of the governance styles of the agencies in which they are employed. The leadership or governance style in large organizational
settings often is authoritarian, hierarchical and bureaucratic, approaches that are antithetical to the more participative
leadership styles favored by many mental health professionals in their clinical activities. Clinical leaders in mental health
organizations must exhibit various competencies to successfully address demoralization in clinical staff and to provide a
counterbalance to the effects of the governance style of many agencies in which they are employed. Appropriate leadership
skills, sometimes too simplistically termed “social support”, have been found to reduce burnout in various populations and
are likely to lessen demoralization as well. This paper reviews these important leadership issues and the relationship of
social support to recognized leadership competencies.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Paper
- Pages 1-8
- DOI 10.1007/s11126-012-9217-3
- Authors
- Stewart Gabel, Division of Children and Family Services, New York State Office of Mental Health, 44 Holland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208, USA
- Journal Psychiatric Quarterly
- Online ISSN 1573-6709
- Print ISSN 0033-2720