Abstract
There is increasing emphasis on the use routine outcome assessment measures to inform quality assurance initiatives. The calculation
of reliable and clinically significant change indices is one strategy that organizations could use to develop both internal
and externally focused benchmarking processes. The current study aimed to develop reliable and clinically significant change
indices for a range of commonly used outcome measures in the substance abuse field. Participants were attending Kedesh Rehabilitation
Services, an Australian residential substance abuse service that also accepts people with co-occurring mental health problems
(n = 595). A range of mental health and substance use measures were administered to participants at intake to the service, and
just prior to discharge at 7-weeks. Participants demonstrated statistically significant improvement across each of the measures.
Rates of clinically significant improvement varied from 44 % to 85 % dependent on the criteria and outcome measure used. The
calculation of clinically significant change provides a low cost, and relatively straightforward approach to evaluating and
benchmarking program activities. It is likely that the results from the current study will be beneficial for other residential
substance abuse services looking to benchmark their own program activities.
of reliable and clinically significant change indices is one strategy that organizations could use to develop both internal
and externally focused benchmarking processes. The current study aimed to develop reliable and clinically significant change
indices for a range of commonly used outcome measures in the substance abuse field. Participants were attending Kedesh Rehabilitation
Services, an Australian residential substance abuse service that also accepts people with co-occurring mental health problems
(n = 595). A range of mental health and substance use measures were administered to participants at intake to the service, and
just prior to discharge at 7-weeks. Participants demonstrated statistically significant improvement across each of the measures.
Rates of clinically significant improvement varied from 44 % to 85 % dependent on the criteria and outcome measure used. The
calculation of clinically significant change provides a low cost, and relatively straightforward approach to evaluating and
benchmarking program activities. It is likely that the results from the current study will be beneficial for other residential
substance abuse services looking to benchmark their own program activities.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-12
- DOI 10.1007/s11469-012-9384-3
- Authors
- Daniel D. Billingham, Illawarra Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Peter J. Kelly, Illawarra Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Frank P. Deane, Illawarra Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Trevor P. Crowe, Illawarra Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Mark S. Buckingham, Kedesh Rehabilitation Services, Unanderra, Australia
- Fiona L. Craig, Kedesh Rehabilitation Services, Unanderra, Australia
- Journal International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
- Online ISSN 1557-1882
- Print ISSN 1557-1874