Abstract
This paper defines and promotes the qualities of a “bottom-up” approach to single-case research (SCR) data analysis. Although
“top-down” models, for example, multi-level or hierarchical linear models, are gaining momentum and have much to offer, interventionists
should be cautious about analyses that are not easily understood, are not governed by a “wide lens” visual analysis, do not
yield intuitive results, and remove the analysis process from the interventionist, who alone has intimate understanding of
the design logic and resulting data patterns. “Bottom-up” analysis possesses benefits which fit well with SCR, including applicability
to designs with few data points and few phases, customization of analyses based on design and data idiosyncrasies, conformation
with visual analysis, and directly meaningful effect sizes. Examples are provided to illustrate these benefits of bottom-up
analyses.
“top-down” models, for example, multi-level or hierarchical linear models, are gaining momentum and have much to offer, interventionists
should be cautious about analyses that are not easily understood, are not governed by a “wide lens” visual analysis, do not
yield intuitive results, and remove the analysis process from the interventionist, who alone has intimate understanding of
the design logic and resulting data patterns. “Bottom-up” analysis possesses benefits which fit well with SCR, including applicability
to designs with few data points and few phases, customization of analyses based on design and data idiosyncrasies, conformation
with visual analysis, and directly meaningful effect sizes. Examples are provided to illustrate these benefits of bottom-up
analyses.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Paper
- Pages 1-12
- DOI 10.1007/s10864-012-9153-1
- Authors
- Richard I. Parker, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA
- Kimberly J. Vannest, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA
- Journal Journal of Behavioral Education
- Online ISSN 1573-3513
- Print ISSN 1053-0819