A Three-Pronged Approach to Addressing Racial Disproportionality and Disparities in Child Welfare: The Santa Clara County Example of Leadership, Collaboration and Data-Driven Decisions

Disproportionality and disparities in the treatment of children of color has been a growing concern in the child welfare system.
System stakeholders have begun to recognize the problem through data, which help identify discrepancies within their jurisdictions.
Nationally, the primary concern is the overrepresentation of African American children within the child welfare system, where
African Americans represent proportions of the foster population at a level more than twice as high as they are represented
in the community at large. In some jurisdictions, however, this is only one piece of the disproportionality concern. San Jose,
for example, has both an overrepresentation of African American and an overrepresentation of Hispanic children in the child
welfare system. Because San Jose’s child welfare population is unique, they have had to take a unique approach to addressing
these concerns. This article outlines strategies and tools used to begin reducing disproportionality within the child welfare
and juvenile dependency court system, using San Jose’s experience as an example. Some of the key approaches to addressing
disproportionality include ensuring a systems approach (creating a Cross Agency Systems Team that prioritizes services for
parents and children in various systems, e.g., mental health, substance abuse, etc.); addressing disproportionality from multiple
perspectives and examining the roles’ of caseworkers, supervisors, service providers, judges, and attorneys; gaining community
and system stakeholder buy-in by maintaining momentum and providing opportunities for dialogue about the complex issues facing
families of color; using a data-driven approach to inform ongoing initiatives and changes in policy and practice (e.g., closely
examining policies and practices such as the frequency of recommendations to by-pass reunification services); and implementing
changes in practice at multiple levels including child welfare and on the bench. The examination of San Jose’s approach reveals
challenges, successes, and lessons learned.