• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

How should we assess knowledge translation in research organizations; designing a Knowledge Translation Self-Assessment Tool for Research Institutes (SATORI)

Background:
The knowledge translation self-assessment tool for research institutes (SATORI) has been designed to assess the status of knowledge translation in research institutes. The objective was, therefore, to identify the weaknesses and strengths of knowledge translation in research centres and faculties affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS).
Methods:
The tool, consisting of 50 statements in four main domains, was used in 20 TUMS-affiliated research centres and departments after its reliability was approved. In this study the self-assessment tool was completed in a group discussion by the members of the research council, researchers and the representatives of research users from each centre and/or department.
Results:
The mean score obtained in the four domains of ‘The question of research’, ‘Knowledge production’, ‘Knowledge transfer’ and ‘Promoting the use of evidence’ were 2.26, 2.92, 2 and 1.89 (out of 5) respectively.Nine out of 12 interventional priorities with the lowest quartile score were related to knowledge transfer resources and strategies, whereas eight of them were in the highest quartile and related to ‘The question of research’ and ‘Knowledge production’.
Conclusions:
The self-assessment tool identifies the gaps in capacity and infrastructure of knowledge translation support within research organizations. Assessment of research institutes using SATORI pointed out that strengthening knowledge translation through provision of financial support for knowledge translation activities, creating supportive and facilitating infrastructures, and facilitating interactions between researchers and target audiences to exchange questions and research findings are among the priorities of research centres and/or departments.

Posted in: Open Access Journal Articles on 03/09/2011 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice