“You’re Such a Girl!” The Psychological Drain of the Gender-Role Harassment of Men

Men experience gender-role harassment when they are ridiculed or ostracized for being “not man enough” (Berdahl 2007). Although men’s emotional (e.g. shame and anxiety) and behavioural reactions (e.g. aggression) to gender-threatening feedback
have been documented (Vandello et al. 2008), potential cognitive and self-regulatory consequences of this form of harassment have yet to be investigated. In the present
experiment, 84 Introductory Psychology men at a Canadian university (Winnipeg, Manitoba) either experienced or did not experience
gender-role harassment (i.e. told they squeezed a handgrip ‘like a girl’) before completing a set of tests (an anagram test,
a stroop color-naming task, and a subsequent handgrip task). To ensure our experimental manipulation invoked a threat to participant’s
sense of manliness, we also included an open-ended measure of self-identification. In accordance with Social Identity research
(Ellemers, Spears, & Doosje, 2002), we anticipated that harassed men would affirm male self-aspects significantly more so than non-harassed men. Overall, results
demonstrated that, as predicted, gender-role harassment significantly threatened participant’s sense of manhood, compromised
cognitive ability, and weakened attentional self-control compared to the no harassment control condition. However, contrary
to predictions, harassment did not weaken self-regulatory physical strength: men in the harassment condition exhibited increased
handgrip strength compared to men in the no harassment condition, suggesting potential compensatory reactions occurred, as
well. Implications of gender-role harassment for men’s psychological well-being, intellect, and impulse control are discussed
and areas for future research are outlined.