Abstract
The authors, both long-time LCSWs, utilize an existential framework and postmodern lens to explore the implications of increased
professional regulation in clinical practice. Specifically emphasized, are the themes of litigation-fear and the threat of
license revocation that are prevalent in the field of clinical social work at this time. The authors argue that this “climate
of fear” can lead to a slippery slope for a profession that has long valued the individual’s right (both client’s and practitioner’s)
to self-determination, authenticity, and creativity and call for an increased conversation among practitioners about the desired
role of regulation in the profession with the overall goal of protecting a true understanding of ethics in social work.
professional regulation in clinical practice. Specifically emphasized, are the themes of litigation-fear and the threat of
license revocation that are prevalent in the field of clinical social work at this time. The authors argue that this “climate
of fear” can lead to a slippery slope for a profession that has long valued the individual’s right (both client’s and practitioner’s)
to self-determination, authenticity, and creativity and call for an increased conversation among practitioners about the desired
role of regulation in the profession with the overall goal of protecting a true understanding of ethics in social work.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-7
- DOI 10.1007/s10615-011-0314-9
- Authors
- Melissa R. Floyd, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC USA
- Daniel Rhodes, Guilford College, Greensboro, NC USA
- Journal Clinical Social Work Journal
- Online ISSN 1573-3343
- Print ISSN 0091-1674