Abstract
A barrier to the development and refinement of ethics education in and across health professional schools is that there is
not an agreed upon instrument or method for assessment in ethics education. The most widely used ethics education assessment
instrument is the Defining Issues Test (DIT) I & II. This instrument is not specific to the health professions. But it has
been modified for use in, and influenced the development of other instruments in, the health professions. The DIT contains
certain philosophical assumptions (“Kohlbergian” or “neo-Kohlbergian”) that have been criticized in recent years. It is also
expensive for large institutions to use. The purpose of this article is to offer a rubric—which the authors have named the
Health Professional Ethics Rubric—for the assessment of several learning outcomes related to ethics education in health science
centers. This rubric is not open to the same philosophical critiques as the DIT and other such instruments. This rubric is
also practical to use. This article includes the rubric being advocated, which was developed by faculty and administrators
at a large academic health science center as a part of a campus-wide ethics education initiative. The process of developing
the rubric is described, as well as certain limitations and plans for revision.
not an agreed upon instrument or method for assessment in ethics education. The most widely used ethics education assessment
instrument is the Defining Issues Test (DIT) I & II. This instrument is not specific to the health professions. But it has
been modified for use in, and influenced the development of other instruments in, the health professions. The DIT contains
certain philosophical assumptions (“Kohlbergian” or “neo-Kohlbergian”) that have been criticized in recent years. It is also
expensive for large institutions to use. The purpose of this article is to offer a rubric—which the authors have named the
Health Professional Ethics Rubric—for the assessment of several learning outcomes related to ethics education in health science
centers. This rubric is not open to the same philosophical critiques as the DIT and other such instruments. This rubric is
also practical to use. This article includes the rubric being advocated, which was developed by faculty and administrators
at a large academic health science center as a part of a campus-wide ethics education initiative. The process of developing
the rubric is described, as well as certain limitations and plans for revision.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-14
- DOI 10.1007/s10805-011-9146-z
- Authors
- Nathan Carlin, Assistant Professor of Medical Humanities, McGovern Center for Humanities and Ethics, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 6431 Fannin, Jesse Jones Library, Room 410, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Cathy Rozmus, School of Nursing, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- Jeffrey Spike, McGovern Center for Humanities and Ethics, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- Irmgard Willcockson, School of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- William Seifert, The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- Cynthia Chappell, School of Public Health, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- Pei-Hsuan Hsieh, Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- Thomas Cole, McGovern Center for Humanities and Ethics, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- Catherine Flaitz, School of Dentistry, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- Joan Engebretson, School of Nursing, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- Rebecca Lunstroth, Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- Charles Amos, Office of Institutional Quality Assurance, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- Bryant Boutwell, McGovern Center for Humanities and Ethics, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- Journal Journal of Academic Ethics
- Online ISSN 1572-8544
- Print ISSN 1570-1727