Abstract
Fruit and vegetable consumption represents a nutritional goal to prevent obesity and chronic illness. To change dietary behaviors,
people must be motivated to do so, and they must translate their motivation into actual behavior. The present experiment aims
at the psychological mechanisms that support such changes, with a particular focus on dietary self-efficacy and planning skills.
A randomized controlled trial compared a theory-based psychological intervention with a health education session in 114 participants.
Dependent variables were fruit and vegetable consumption, intention to consume more fruit and vegetables, planning to consume
more, and dietary self-efficacy, assessed before the intervention, 1 week afterwards, and at 6-week follow up. Significant
group by time interactions for all four dependent variables documented superior treatment effects for the psychological intervention
group, with substantially higher scores at posttest and follow-up for the experimental group, although all students benefited
from participation. To identify the contribution of the main intervention ingredients (self-efficacy and planning), regression
analyses yielded mediator effects for these two factors. A social-cognitive intervention to improve fruit and vegetable consumption
was superior to a knowledge-based education session. Self-efficacy and planning seem to play a major role in the mechanisms
that facilitate dietary changes.
people must be motivated to do so, and they must translate their motivation into actual behavior. The present experiment aims
at the psychological mechanisms that support such changes, with a particular focus on dietary self-efficacy and planning skills.
A randomized controlled trial compared a theory-based psychological intervention with a health education session in 114 participants.
Dependent variables were fruit and vegetable consumption, intention to consume more fruit and vegetables, planning to consume
more, and dietary self-efficacy, assessed before the intervention, 1 week afterwards, and at 6-week follow up. Significant
group by time interactions for all four dependent variables documented superior treatment effects for the psychological intervention
group, with substantially higher scores at posttest and follow-up for the experimental group, although all students benefited
from participation. To identify the contribution of the main intervention ingredients (self-efficacy and planning), regression
analyses yielded mediator effects for these two factors. A social-cognitive intervention to improve fruit and vegetable consumption
was superior to a knowledge-based education session. Self-efficacy and planning seem to play a major role in the mechanisms
that facilitate dietary changes.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-9
- DOI 10.1007/s10865-011-9373-1
- Authors
- Pimchanok Kreausukon, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- Paul Gellert, Health Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany
- Sonia Lippke, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- Ralf Schwarzer, Health Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany
- Journal Journal of Behavioral Medicine
- Online ISSN 1573-3521
- Print ISSN 0160-7715