Abstract
Adolescent girls are involved in physical dating violence as both perpetrators and victims, and there are negative consequences
associated with each of these behaviors. This article used a prospective design with 519 girls dating in grade 9 to predict
profiles of dating violence in grade 11 based on relationships with families of origin (child maltreatment experiences, harsh
parenting), and peers (harassment, delinquency, relational aggression). In addition, dating violence profiles were compared
on numerous indices of adjustment (school connectedness, grades, self-efficacy and community connectedness) and maladjustment
(suicide attempts, distress, delinquency, sexual behavior) for descriptive purposes. The most common profile was no dating
violence (n = 367) followed by mutual violence (n = 81). Smaller numbers of girls reported victimization or perpetration only (ns = 39 and 32, respectively). Predicting grade 11 dating violence profile membership from grade 9 relationships was limited,
although delinquency, parental rejection, and sexual harassment perpetration predicted membership to the mutually violent
group, and delinquency predicted the perpetrator-only group. Compared to the non-violent group, the mutually violent girls
in grade 11 had lower grades, poorer self-efficacy, and lower school connectedness and community involvement. Furthermore,
they had higher rates of peer aggression and delinquency, were less likely to use condoms and were much more likely to have
considered suicide. There were fewer differences among the profiles for girls involved with dating violence. In addition,
the victims-only group reported higher rates of sexual intercourse, comparable to the mutually violent group and those involved
in nonviolent relationships. Implications for prevention and intervention are highlighted.
associated with each of these behaviors. This article used a prospective design with 519 girls dating in grade 9 to predict
profiles of dating violence in grade 11 based on relationships with families of origin (child maltreatment experiences, harsh
parenting), and peers (harassment, delinquency, relational aggression). In addition, dating violence profiles were compared
on numerous indices of adjustment (school connectedness, grades, self-efficacy and community connectedness) and maladjustment
(suicide attempts, distress, delinquency, sexual behavior) for descriptive purposes. The most common profile was no dating
violence (n = 367) followed by mutual violence (n = 81). Smaller numbers of girls reported victimization or perpetration only (ns = 39 and 32, respectively). Predicting grade 11 dating violence profile membership from grade 9 relationships was limited,
although delinquency, parental rejection, and sexual harassment perpetration predicted membership to the mutually violent
group, and delinquency predicted the perpetrator-only group. Compared to the non-violent group, the mutually violent girls
in grade 11 had lower grades, poorer self-efficacy, and lower school connectedness and community involvement. Furthermore,
they had higher rates of peer aggression and delinquency, were less likely to use condoms and were much more likely to have
considered suicide. There were fewer differences among the profiles for girls involved with dating violence. In addition,
the victims-only group reported higher rates of sexual intercourse, comparable to the mutually violent group and those involved
in nonviolent relationships. Implications for prevention and intervention are highlighted.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-10
- DOI 10.1007/s11121-011-0236-3
- Authors
- Debbie Chiodo, CAMH Centre for Prevention Science, 100 Collip Circle, Suite 100, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 4X8
- Claire V. Crooks, CAMH Centre for Prevention Science, 100 Collip Circle, Suite 100, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 4X8
- David A. Wolfe, CAMH Centre for Prevention Science and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Caroline McIsaac, LeMarsh Research Centre, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Ray Hughes, CAMH Centre for Prevention Science, 100 Collip Circle, Suite 100, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 4X8
- Peter G. Jaffe, Centre for Research and Education on Violence Against Women and Children, Faculty of Education, University of Western Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Journal Prevention Science
- Online ISSN 1573-6695
- Print ISSN 1389-4986