Knowing when to let go at the entrance to university: Beneficial effects of compensatory secondary control after failure

We present results on the beneficial effects of compensatory secondary control strategies in a sample who failed the entrance
exam at an university. Based on the action phase model of developmental regulation we assumed that failing the exam represents
the passing of a developmental deadline. We thus hypothesized that compensatory secondary control is associated with a more
positive trajectory of satisfaction with life. Multi-group structural equation models showed that (1) compensatory secondary
control was associated with higher levels of and a steeper increase in satisfaction with life in the group who failed but
not for the group who passed and that (2) in the group who failed the exam, the slope coefficient indicated a significantly
steeper increase of satisfaction with life in those who reported higher compensatory secondary control. These results show
that letting go a goal can sometimes be more adaptive than persistent goal striving.