Abstract
This study tested whether Marcia’s original identity statuses of achievement, moratorium, early closure (a new label for foreclosure),
and diffusion, can be considered identity status trajectories. That is, we examined whether these statuses are distinct and
relatively stable, over-time configurations of commitment strength, levels of in-depth exploration of present commitments,
and consideration of alternative commitments. The study examined identity development in a five-wave study of 923 early-to-middle
(49.3% female) and 390 middle-to-late adolescents (56.7% female), covering the ages of 12–20. Using Latent class growth analysis
(LCGA), the authors found that Marcia’s (1966) statuses are indeed identity status trajectories. Two kinds of moratorium were also found: the classical moratorium and
searching moratorium. Support was found for Waterman’s developmental hypothesis of the identity status model: the number of
achievers was significantly higher, and the number of diffusions lower, in middle-to-late adolescence than in early-to-middle
adolescence. Females were more often in the advanced identity status trajectories, and stable differences were found between
the trajectories in psychosocial adjustment. Study findings highlight that identity formation should be conceptualized as
an over-time process.
and diffusion, can be considered identity status trajectories. That is, we examined whether these statuses are distinct and
relatively stable, over-time configurations of commitment strength, levels of in-depth exploration of present commitments,
and consideration of alternative commitments. The study examined identity development in a five-wave study of 923 early-to-middle
(49.3% female) and 390 middle-to-late adolescents (56.7% female), covering the ages of 12–20. Using Latent class growth analysis
(LCGA), the authors found that Marcia’s (1966) statuses are indeed identity status trajectories. Two kinds of moratorium were also found: the classical moratorium and
searching moratorium. Support was found for Waterman’s developmental hypothesis of the identity status model: the number of
achievers was significantly higher, and the number of diffusions lower, in middle-to-late adolescence than in early-to-middle
adolescence. Females were more often in the advanced identity status trajectories, and stable differences were found between
the trajectories in psychosocial adjustment. Study findings highlight that identity formation should be conceptualized as
an over-time process.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Empirical Research
- Pages 1-14
- DOI 10.1007/s10964-011-9730-y
- Authors
- Wim Meeus, Research Centre Adolescent Development, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Rens van de Schoot, Department of Methods and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Loes Keijsers, Research Centre Adolescent Development, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Susan Branje, Research Centre Adolescent Development, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Journal Journal of Youth and Adolescence
- Online ISSN 1573-6601
- Print ISSN 0047-2891