Abstract
This essay examines recent efforts to enact right to work laws and analyzes the impact of such laws on union development.
The argument is that right to work is an invidious anomaly in federal collective bargaining policy, and Section 14(b) should
be eliminated from the National Labor Relations Act. Proponents of right to work legislation claim that such laws promote
economic development, but the evidence for that claim is unconvincing. Alternatively, supporters of the legislation assert
that it promotes individual liberties in our market economy. Opponents of right to work challenge the normative dimension
of right to work as an empty ideology that cannot withstand critical scrutiny. Right to work is inimical to the economic and
social interests of American workers.
The argument is that right to work is an invidious anomaly in federal collective bargaining policy, and Section 14(b) should
be eliminated from the National Labor Relations Act. Proponents of right to work legislation claim that such laws promote
economic development, but the evidence for that claim is unconvincing. Alternatively, supporters of the legislation assert
that it promotes individual liberties in our market economy. Opponents of right to work challenge the normative dimension
of right to work as an empty ideology that cannot withstand critical scrutiny. Right to work is inimical to the economic and
social interests of American workers.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-10
- DOI 10.1007/s10672-011-9183-1
- Authors
- Raymond L. Hogler, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1275, USA
- Journal Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
- Online ISSN 1573-3378
- Print ISSN 0892-7545