Abstract
Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is an outreach-based case management model that assists people with severe mental illness
through an intensive and integrated approach. In this program, a multidisciplinary team provides medical and psychosocial
services. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the following two ACT intervention strategies: “replacement”
(supporting the clients) versus “backup” (supporting family members who provide care to clients). Admission days, psychiatric
symptoms, quality of life, self-efficacy, and service satisfaction ware evaluated as outcome variables. To identify effective
methods of supporting family members, clients living with family were divided into two groups based on the amount and types
of services received—the backup group and the replacement group. ANCOVA was used to compare the outcomes between the two groups.
The replacement group displayed significantly better psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, self-efficacy, and service
satisfaction scores. No differences in admission days or quality of life were found. Clients provided more support directly
to clients themselves than to family members was found to have better client outcomes in improving psychiatric symptoms, social
functioning, and self-efficacy, resulting in higher levels of service satisfaction. This indicates that society should reduce
the responsibility of the family and share responsibility for the care of people with mental illness to effectively improve
outcomes for people with mental illnesses.
through an intensive and integrated approach. In this program, a multidisciplinary team provides medical and psychosocial
services. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the following two ACT intervention strategies: “replacement”
(supporting the clients) versus “backup” (supporting family members who provide care to clients). Admission days, psychiatric
symptoms, quality of life, self-efficacy, and service satisfaction ware evaluated as outcome variables. To identify effective
methods of supporting family members, clients living with family were divided into two groups based on the amount and types
of services received—the backup group and the replacement group. ANCOVA was used to compare the outcomes between the two groups.
The replacement group displayed significantly better psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, self-efficacy, and service
satisfaction scores. No differences in admission days or quality of life were found. Clients provided more support directly
to clients themselves than to family members was found to have better client outcomes in improving psychiatric symptoms, social
functioning, and self-efficacy, resulting in higher levels of service satisfaction. This indicates that society should reduce
the responsibility of the family and share responsibility for the care of people with mental illness to effectively improve
outcomes for people with mental illnesses.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Paper
- Pages 1-8
- DOI 10.1007/s10597-011-9444-3
- Authors
- Tamaki Sono, Psilocybe Inc., 237 Sano, Higashi-Ohmi, Shiga, Japan
- Iwao Oshima, Graduate School of Social Welfare, Japan College of Social Work, 3-1-30 Takeoka, Kiyose, Tokyo, Japan
- Junichiro Ito, Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Japan, 4-1-1 Ogawahigashi-cho, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan
- Masaaki Nishio, Faculty of Comprehensive Welfare, Tohoku Fukushi University, 1-8-1 Kunimi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
- Yuriko Suzuki, Department of Adult Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawahigashi-cho, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan
- Kentaro Horiuchi, Kohnodai Hospital, International Medical Center of Japan, 1-7-1 Kohnodai, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan
- Nobuyuki Niekawa, Social Work Research Institute, Japan College of Social Work, 3-1-30 Takeoka, Kiyose, Tokyo, Japan
- Masayo Ogawa, School of Nursing, University of Shizuoka, 52-1 Yada, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka, Japan
- Yutaro Setoya, Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Japan, 4-1-1 Ogawahigashi-cho, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan
- Kazumi Tsukada, Kohnodai Hospital, International Medical Center of Japan, 1-7-1 Kohnodai, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan
- Journal Community Mental Health Journal
- Online ISSN 1573-2789
- Print ISSN 0010-3853