Abstract
The effective delivery of wraparound depends upon the availability of a wide range of community-based services. This study
seeks to determine the impact of proximity to resources on the effectiveness of a wraparound program for stabilizing foster
care placements among a sample of youth. We present a methodology for deriving proximity scores for individual clients using
Geographic Information Systems technology, and incorporate this score into a model for predicting placement disruption among
youth in foster care receiving services within a wraparound model aimed at preventing placement disruptions. Cox Regression
is used to predict length of time until placement disruption using clinical, demographic, and service proximity measures.
Risk of placement disruption is predicted by trauma experiences, risk behaviors, and age, and is reduced by the presence of
child strengths and proximity to resources. The impact of proximity to resources on placement disruption varies by land use
type, suggesting that proximity exerts a greater impact on youth in rural and suburban areas than in urban areas where wraparound
service delivery models may be able to overcome distance and other barriers. Implications for the implementation of wraparound
programs as well as service system planning are discussed.
seeks to determine the impact of proximity to resources on the effectiveness of a wraparound program for stabilizing foster
care placements among a sample of youth. We present a methodology for deriving proximity scores for individual clients using
Geographic Information Systems technology, and incorporate this score into a model for predicting placement disruption among
youth in foster care receiving services within a wraparound model aimed at preventing placement disruptions. Cox Regression
is used to predict length of time until placement disruption using clinical, demographic, and service proximity measures.
Risk of placement disruption is predicted by trauma experiences, risk behaviors, and age, and is reduced by the presence of
child strengths and proximity to resources. The impact of proximity to resources on placement disruption varies by land use
type, suggesting that proximity exerts a greater impact on youth in rural and suburban areas than in urban areas where wraparound
service delivery models may be able to overcome distance and other barriers. Implications for the implementation of wraparound
programs as well as service system planning are discussed.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-13
- DOI 10.1007/s10826-011-9469-9
- Authors
- Dana A. Weiner, Northwestern University, 710 N. Lake Shore Drive #1223, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Scott C. Leon, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
- Michael J. Stiehl, Northwestern University, 710 N. Lake Shore Drive #1223, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Journal Journal of Child and Family Studies
- Online ISSN 1573-2843
- Print ISSN 1062-1024