Abstract
This article compares Dutch rural and non-rural adolescents’ delinquent behavior and examines two social correlates of rural
delinquency: communal social control and traditional rural culture. The analyses are based on cross-sectional data, containing
3,797 participants aged 13–18 (48.7% females). The analyses show that rural adolescents are only slightly less likely to engage
in delinquent behavior. Furthermore, while rural adolescents are exposed more often to communal social control, this does
not substantially reduce the likelihood that they engage in delinquent behavior. Concerning rural culture, marked differences
appeared between rural and non-rural adolescents. First, alcohol use and the frequency of visiting pubs were more related
to rural adolescents’ engagement in delinquent behavior. Second, the gender gap in delinquency is larger among rural adolescents:
whereas rural boys did not differ significantly from non-rural boys, rural girls were significantly less likely to engage
in delinquent behavior than non-rural girls. However, the magnitude of the effects of most indicators was rather low. To better
account for the variety of rural spaces and cultures, it is recommended that future research into antisocial and criminal
behavior of rural adolescents should adopt alternative measurements of rurality, instead of using an indicator of population
density only.
delinquency: communal social control and traditional rural culture. The analyses are based on cross-sectional data, containing
3,797 participants aged 13–18 (48.7% females). The analyses show that rural adolescents are only slightly less likely to engage
in delinquent behavior. Furthermore, while rural adolescents are exposed more often to communal social control, this does
not substantially reduce the likelihood that they engage in delinquent behavior. Concerning rural culture, marked differences
appeared between rural and non-rural adolescents. First, alcohol use and the frequency of visiting pubs were more related
to rural adolescents’ engagement in delinquent behavior. Second, the gender gap in delinquency is larger among rural adolescents:
whereas rural boys did not differ significantly from non-rural boys, rural girls were significantly less likely to engage
in delinquent behavior than non-rural girls. However, the magnitude of the effects of most indicators was rather low. To better
account for the variety of rural spaces and cultures, it is recommended that future research into antisocial and criminal
behavior of rural adolescents should adopt alternative measurements of rurality, instead of using an indicator of population
density only.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-15
- DOI 10.1007/s10964-011-9650-x
- Authors
- Don Weenink, Department of Social Science, Rural Sociology Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, P.O. Box 8130, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Journal Journal of Youth and Adolescence
- Online ISSN 1573-6601
- Print ISSN 0047-2891