Cross-national differences in questionnaires do not necessarily reflect comparable differences in disorder prevalence

To examine whether the widely used Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) can validly be used to compare the prevalence
of child mental health problems cross nationally.

We used data on 29,225 5- to 16-year olds in eight population-based studies from seven countries: Bangladesh, Brazil, Britain,
India, Norway, Russia and Yemen. Parents completed the SDQ in all eight studies, teachers in seven studies and youth in five
studies. We used these SDQ data to calculate three different sorts of “caseness indicators” based on (1) SDQ symptoms, (2)
SDQ symptoms plus impact and (3) an overall respondent judgement of ‘definite’ or ‘severe’ difficulties. Respondents also
completed structured diagnostic interviews including extensive open-ended questions (the Development and Well-Being Assessment,
DAWBA). Diagnostic ratings were all carried out or supervised by the DAWBA’s creator, working in conjunction with experienced
local professionals.

As judged by the DAWBA, the prevalence of any mental disorder ranged from 2.2% in India to 17.1% in Russia. The nine SDQ caseness
indicators (three indicators times three informants) explained 8–56% of the cross-national variation in disorder prevalence.
This was insufficient to make meaningful prevalence estimates since populations with a similar measured prevalence of disorder
on the DAWBA showed large variations across the various SDQ caseness indicators.

The relationship between SDQ caseness indicators and disorder rates varies substantially between populations: cross-national
differences in SDQ indicators do not necessarily reflect comparable differences in disorder rates. More generally, considerable
caution is required when interpreting cross-cultural comparisons of mental health, particularly when these rely on brief questionnaires.