Cross-Cultural Preferences for Distributive Justice Principles: Resource Type and Uncertainty Management

Drawing on social resource theory, we investigated the evaluation of distributive justice principles in relation to material
benefits (monetary rewards in working life) and symbolic benefits (praise at university) in a cross-cultural study. We predicted
that the equity principle would be perceived as more just for distributing culturally valued resources, whereas the equality
principle would be perceived as more just for resources that are less valued within culture. Moreover, applying uncertainty
management theory, we predicted that cross-cultural fairness evaluations would be more pronounced for individuals with higher
(vs. lower) uncertainty avoidance or lower (vs. higher) uncertainty tolerance. Data of 608 Canadian and German students were
collected in a two-wave survey. As expected, when allocating material benefits Canadians found the equity principle to be
more just than did Germans, whereas Germans perceived the equality principle as more just than did Canadians. When allocating
symbolic benefits, by contrast, Canadians perceived equality as more just than did Germans, though unexpectedly culture did
not influence evaluations of the equity principle. Finally, consistent with uncertainty management theory, some of the cultural
differences in the evaluation of distributive principles were more pronounced among people with higher uncertainty avoidance
and lower uncertainty tolerance. Implications for cross-cultural research on distributive justice are discussed.