Abstract
We tested the cost-effectiveness of giving low-income parents childcare discounts contingent on their participation in the
Chicago Parent Program, a 12-session preventive parent training (PT) program offered at their child’s daycare center. Eight
centers were matched and randomized to an experimental condition in which parents received a discount on their childcare bill
(M = $8.92 per session attended) or a control group with no financial incentive. Participants (n = 174) consisted mostly of African American (55%) or Latino (42%) mothers, 62% reporting annual household incomes less than
$20,000. Parents in the discount condition were 15.4% more likely to enroll than control parents, though this difference was
not significant. There were no differences in PT attendance, parents’ motivations for enrolling, or the degree to which parents
were actively engaged in PT sessions by condition. Despite the added cost of the discounts, there was no difference in group
costs by condition. Parent interviews revealed important challenges in implementing financial incentive programs in community-based
agencies serving low-income families. Cost simulations show how low parent enrollment or low attendance negatively affect
the economic efficiency of group-based PT. Implications for policies guiding financial incentive programs targeting low-income
families and their participation in prevention programs are discussed.
Chicago Parent Program, a 12-session preventive parent training (PT) program offered at their child’s daycare center. Eight
centers were matched and randomized to an experimental condition in which parents received a discount on their childcare bill
(M = $8.92 per session attended) or a control group with no financial incentive. Participants (n = 174) consisted mostly of African American (55%) or Latino (42%) mothers, 62% reporting annual household incomes less than
$20,000. Parents in the discount condition were 15.4% more likely to enroll than control parents, though this difference was
not significant. There were no differences in PT attendance, parents’ motivations for enrolling, or the degree to which parents
were actively engaged in PT sessions by condition. Despite the added cost of the discounts, there was no difference in group
costs by condition. Parent interviews revealed important challenges in implementing financial incentive programs in community-based
agencies serving low-income families. Cost simulations show how low parent enrollment or low attendance negatively affect
the economic efficiency of group-based PT. Implications for policies guiding financial incentive programs targeting low-income
families and their participation in prevention programs are discussed.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Paper
- Pages 1-16
- DOI 10.1007/s10935-011-0255-7
- Authors
- Deborah Gross, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Tricia Johnson, Rush University College of Health Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA
- Alison Ridge, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
- Christine Garvey, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
- Wrenetha Julion, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
- Anne Brusius Treysman, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
- Susan Breitenstein, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
- Louis Fogg, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
- Journal The Journal of Primary Prevention
- Online ISSN 1573-6547
- Print ISSN 0278-095X