• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Choosing Aggregation Rules for Composite Indicators

Abstract  

From a formal point of view, a composite indicator is an aggregate of all dimensions, objectives, individual indicators and
variables used for its construction. This implies that what defines a composite indicator is the set of properties underlying
its mathematical aggregation convention. In this article, I try to revise the theoretical debate on aggregation rules by looking
at contributions from both voting theory and multi-criteria decision analysis. This cross-fertilization helps in clarifying
many ambiguous issues still present in the literature and allows discussing the key assumptions that may change the evaluation
of an aggregation rule easily, when a composite indicator has to be constructed.

  • Content Type Journal Article
  • Pages 1-18
  • DOI 10.1007/s11205-011-9911-9
  • Authors
    • Giuseppe Munda, Department of Economics and Economic History, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Edifici B, 08913 Bellaterra, (Barcelona), Spain
    • Journal Social Indicators Research
    • Online ISSN 1573-0921
    • Print ISSN 0303-8300
Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 09/11/2011 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice