Abstract
From a formal point of view, a composite indicator is an aggregate of all dimensions, objectives, individual indicators and
variables used for its construction. This implies that what defines a composite indicator is the set of properties underlying
its mathematical aggregation convention. In this article, I try to revise the theoretical debate on aggregation rules by looking
at contributions from both voting theory and multi-criteria decision analysis. This cross-fertilization helps in clarifying
many ambiguous issues still present in the literature and allows discussing the key assumptions that may change the evaluation
of an aggregation rule easily, when a composite indicator has to be constructed.
variables used for its construction. This implies that what defines a composite indicator is the set of properties underlying
its mathematical aggregation convention. In this article, I try to revise the theoretical debate on aggregation rules by looking
at contributions from both voting theory and multi-criteria decision analysis. This cross-fertilization helps in clarifying
many ambiguous issues still present in the literature and allows discussing the key assumptions that may change the evaluation
of an aggregation rule easily, when a composite indicator has to be constructed.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-18
- DOI 10.1007/s11205-011-9911-9
- Authors
- Giuseppe Munda, Department of Economics and Economic History, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Edifici B, 08913 Bellaterra, (Barcelona), Spain
- Journal Social Indicators Research
- Online ISSN 1573-0921
- Print ISSN 0303-8300