Abstract
Method
A 2 (volitional: implementation intention vs. no implementation intention) × 2 (motivation: mental simulation vs. no mental
simulation) × 3 (nationality: Estonia vs. Finland vs. UK) randomized-controlled design was adopted. Participants completed
baseline psychological measures and self-reported number of alcohol units consumed and binge-drinking frequency followed by
the intervention manipulation. One month later, participants completed follow-up measures of the psychological variables and
alcohol consumption.
simulation) × 3 (nationality: Estonia vs. Finland vs. UK) randomized-controlled design was adopted. Participants completed
baseline psychological measures and self-reported number of alcohol units consumed and binge-drinking frequency followed by
the intervention manipulation. One month later, participants completed follow-up measures of the psychological variables and
alcohol consumption.
Results
Results revealed main effects for implementation intention and nationality on units of alcohol consumed at follow-up and an
implementation intention × nationality interaction. Alcohol consumption was significantly reduced in the implementation intention
condition for the Estonian and UK samples. There was a significant main effect for nationality and an implementation intention × nationality
interaction on binge-drinking frequency. Follow-up tests revealed significant reductions in binge-drinking occasions in the
implementation intention group for the UK sample only.
implementation intention × nationality interaction. Alcohol consumption was significantly reduced in the implementation intention
condition for the Estonian and UK samples. There was a significant main effect for nationality and an implementation intention × nationality
interaction on binge-drinking frequency. Follow-up tests revealed significant reductions in binge-drinking occasions in the
implementation intention group for the UK sample only.
Conclusion
Results support the implementation intention component of the intervention in reducing alcohol drinking in excess of guideline
limits among Estonian and UK undergraduates. There was no support for the motivational intervention or the interaction between
the strategies. Results are discussed with respect to intervention design based on motivational and volitional approaches.
limits among Estonian and UK undergraduates. There was no support for the motivational intervention or the interaction between
the strategies. Results are discussed with respect to intervention design based on motivational and volitional approaches.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-15
- DOI 10.1007/s12529-011-9163-8
- Authors
- Martin S. Hagger, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
- Adam Lonsdale, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, UK
- Andre Koka, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Vello Hein, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Heidi Pasi, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Taru Lintunen, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis, National Institute of Education, Nanyang, Singapore
- Journal International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
- Online ISSN 1532-7558
- Print ISSN 1070-5503