• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

A UK population-based study of the relationship between mental disorder and victimisation

Abstract

Purpose  

To establish the prevalence of victimisation in a UK population-based sample and to investigate the association between mental
disorder and victimisation in both cross-sectional and prospective manner, whilst adjusting for potential confounds.

Methods  

Data from the National Child Development Study (NCDS) were used to examine criminal victimisation, violent victimisation,
and mental disorder at age 46 yerars, and also to measure history of mental disorder, when cohort members were aged 23, 33
and 42 years. Variables considered to be potential confounders or mediators of the association, including socio-economic status,
family income, financial strain, education, housing ownership status, heavy drinking and gender, all measured at age 46 years,
were considered in multivariate analyses.

Results  

The prevalence of criminal victimisation amongst cohort members in the 12 months preceding interview was 15%; 2.2% of the
participants reported experiencing violent victimisation in the past year. Mental disorder at age 46 was significantly associated
with criminal and violent victimisation, even after adjusting for potential confounds. A prior history of mental disorder
was found to be a robust predictor of criminal and violent victimisation.

Conclusions  

This study provides evidence that those with a mental disorder are at elevated risk of victimisation, including violent victimisation.
That such an association might reflect an underlying causal relationship is further supported by the confirmation that the
association holds true when mental disorder is measured well before the assessment of victimisation risk, and that it persists
despite adjustment for a number of potential confounding factors.

  • Content Type Journal Article
  • Category Original Paper
  • Pages 1-10
  • DOI 10.1007/s00127-011-0464-7
  • Authors
    • Christina Hart, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
    • Renée de Vet, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Paul Moran, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
    • Stephani L. Hatch, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
    • Kimberlie Dean, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
    • Journal Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
    • Online ISSN 1433-9285
    • Print ISSN 0933-7954
Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 12/31/2011 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2023 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice