Abstract
Simple logic dictates that some suicide terrorists are more significant than others. However, major questions still remain
about the motives and psychology of 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta, arguably the most significant suicide terrorist in human
history. This article constructs a psychological autopsy of Atta in order to provide a much more complete explanation of his
behavior. First, it suggests that accounts which solely attribute Atta’s actions to religious and political ideology appear
severely incomplete. It then reviews evidence that Atta may have been clinically suicidal, and that his struggles with social
isolation, depression, hopelessness, guilt, and shame were extraordinarily similar to the struggles of those who commit conventional
suicide. Finally, it considers how Atta’s ideology may have interacted with his suicidal tendencies to produce his final act
of murder-suicide on September 11, 2011.
about the motives and psychology of 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta, arguably the most significant suicide terrorist in human
history. This article constructs a psychological autopsy of Atta in order to provide a much more complete explanation of his
behavior. First, it suggests that accounts which solely attribute Atta’s actions to religious and political ideology appear
severely incomplete. It then reviews evidence that Atta may have been clinically suicidal, and that his struggles with social
isolation, depression, hopelessness, guilt, and shame were extraordinarily similar to the struggles of those who commit conventional
suicide. Finally, it considers how Atta’s ideology may have interacted with his suicidal tendencies to produce his final act
of murder-suicide on September 11, 2011.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-10
- DOI 10.1007/s11896-011-9096-9
- Authors
- Adam Lankford, Department of Criminal Justice, The University of Alabama, P.O. Box 870320, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0320, USA
- Journal Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
- Online ISSN 1936-6469
- Print ISSN 0882-0783