• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

System Justification, Satisfaction, and Perceptions of Fairness and Typicality at Work: A Cross-System Comparison Involving the U.S. and Hungary

Abstract  

This research addresses system justification tendencies in the United States and Hungary and their potential to shape reactions
to equity–equality tradeoffs in the workplace. Participants in both nations were asked to rate the fairness of, their satisfaction
with, and the typicality of four hypothetical work situations. These scenarios differed in terms of which distributive justice
principle was violated (equity or equality) and whether the violation favored the participant or the co-worker (self or other).
While the mean level of system justification was lower in Hungary than in the U.S., multilevel models revealed that in both
societal contexts the motivation to justify the system was associated with participants’ perceptions of justice in the workplace.
Based on the characteristics of the two social systems, however, these tendencies played out differently. Specifically, for
the U.S. participants system justification was associated with more favorable views of work situations that emphasized equity
over equality and that rewarded the self over others, whereas for Hungarian participants system justification was associated
with more favorable views of work situations that emphasized equality over equity and that rewarded others over the self.
Results also revealed that Americans (but not Hungarians) who scored higher on system justification perceived as fairer that
which they perceived as more typical of their society. Taken as a whole, the evidence suggests that the psychological transfer
of legitimacy from socialism to capitalism in Hungary remains incomplete.

  • Content Type Journal Article
  • DOI 10.1007/s11211-010-0116-1
  • Authors
    • Jojanneke van der Toorn, Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10003-6634, USA
    • Mihály Berkics, Department of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
    • John T. Jost, Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10003-6634, USA
    • Journal Social Justice Research
    • Online ISSN 1573-6725
    • Print ISSN 0885-7466
    • Journal Volume Volume 23
    • Journal Issue Volume 23, Numbers 2-3
Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 10/24/2010 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2023 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice