• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Self-Reported Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Racially Diverse, Low-Income Study Population

Abstract  

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized, especially in low income, high minority populations. We examined the effect
test-specific barriers have on colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) completion, what rationales are given for non-completion,
and what “switch” patterns exist when participants are allowed to switch from one test to another. Low income adults who were
not up-to-date with CRC screening guidelines were recruited from safety-net clinics and offered colonoscopy or FIT (n = 418).
Follow up telephone surveys assessed test-specific barriers. Test completion was determined from patient medical records.
For subjects who desired colonoscopy at baseline, finding a time to come in and transportation applied more to non-completers
than completers (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). For participants who initially wanted FIT, keeping track of cards, never putting stool on cards,
and not remembering to mail cards back applied more to non-completers than completers (p = 0.003, p = 0.006, and p < 0.001, respectively). The most common rationale given for not completing screening was a desire for the other screening
modality: 7 % of patients who initially preferred screening by FIT completed colonoscopy, while 8 % of patients who initially
preferred screening by colonoscopy completed FIT. We conclude that test-specific barriers apply more to subjects who did not
complete CRC screening. As a common rationale for test non-completion is a desire to receive a different screening modality,
our findings suggest screening rates could be increased by giving patients the opportunity to switch tests after an initial
choice is made.

  • Content Type Journal Article
  • Category Original Paper
  • Pages 1-8
  • DOI 10.1007/s10900-012-9612-6
  • Authors
    • Benjamin W. Quick, Research Division, Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, MS 3064, 4125 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
    • Christina M. Hester, Research Division, Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, MS 3064, 4125 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
    • Kristin L. Young, Research Division, Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, MS 3064, 4125 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
    • K. Allen Greiner, Research Division, Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, MS 3064, 4125 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
    • Journal Journal of Community Health
    • Online ISSN 1573-3610
    • Print ISSN 0094-5145
Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 10/20/2012 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice