Although supervision is recognized as a significant tenant of professional growth for counseling and psychotherapy students, the variability of the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of supervision has come under scrutiny in recent times. Our sample of 128 participants shed light on the most effective (e.g., encouraged autonomy, strengthened the supervisory relationship, and facilitated open discussion) and most ineffective (e.g., depreciated supervision, performed ineffective client conceptualization and treatment, and weakened the supervisory relationship) supervisor skills, techniques, and behaviors. Moreover, effective and ineffective behaviors, along with best and worst supervisors, were significantly differentiated based on the supervisory working alliance, supervisor style, supervisor self-disclosure, supervisee nondisclosure, and supervisee evaluation. Implications for supervision competencies and supervisor accountability are discussed.
- 1966: the year the decade exploded
- The Safety Net
- Normalization of timed neuropsychological tests with the PATA rate and nine-hole pegboard tests
- Current Patterns of Training in Personality Assessment During Internship
- Rethinking monogamy’s nature: From the truth of non/monogamy to a dyke ethics of “antimonogamy”
Category Specific RSS