Although supervision is recognized as a significant tenant of professional growth for counseling and psychotherapy students, the variability of the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of supervision has come under scrutiny in recent times. Our sample of 128 participants shed light on the most effective (e.g., encouraged autonomy, strengthened the supervisory relationship, and facilitated open discussion) and most ineffective (e.g., depreciated supervision, performed ineffective client conceptualization and treatment, and weakened the supervisory relationship) supervisor skills, techniques, and behaviors. Moreover, effective and ineffective behaviors, along with best and worst supervisors, were significantly differentiated based on the supervisory working alliance, supervisor style, supervisor self-disclosure, supervisee nondisclosure, and supervisee evaluation. Implications for supervision competencies and supervisor accountability are discussed.
- A narrative-linguistic approach to understanding Asian American adolescents’ discrimination experiences.
- A Critical Assessment of Social Entrepreneurship: Ostromian Polycentricity and Hayekian Knowledge
- Peer Review in Hungary: Conditional cash transfers and their impact on children
- Horrible Heroes: Liberating Alternative Visions of Disability in Horror
- HIV activism: ‘It feels more like social work than my day job in adult services’
Category Specific RSS