Although supervision is recognized as a significant tenant of professional growth for counseling and psychotherapy students, the variability of the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of supervision has come under scrutiny in recent times. Our sample of 128 participants shed light on the most effective (e.g., encouraged autonomy, strengthened the supervisory relationship, and facilitated open discussion) and most ineffective (e.g., depreciated supervision, performed ineffective client conceptualization and treatment, and weakened the supervisory relationship) supervisor skills, techniques, and behaviors. Moreover, effective and ineffective behaviors, along with best and worst supervisors, were significantly differentiated based on the supervisory working alliance, supervisor style, supervisor self-disclosure, supervisee nondisclosure, and supervisee evaluation. Implications for supervision competencies and supervisor accountability are discussed.
- The value frameworks and motivations for intergenerational transfers from older Australians
- Active Change in Psychodynamic Therapy: Moments of High Receptiveness
- The Role of Attachment Style in Facebook Use and Social Capital: Evidence from University Students and a National Sample
- Put on a Smiley Face: Textspeak and Personality Perceptions
- iCap: instrumented assessment of physical capability
Category Specific RSS