Although supervision is recognized as a significant tenant of professional growth for counseling and psychotherapy students, the variability of the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of supervision has come under scrutiny in recent times. Our sample of 128 participants shed light on the most effective (e.g., encouraged autonomy, strengthened the supervisory relationship, and facilitated open discussion) and most ineffective (e.g., depreciated supervision, performed ineffective client conceptualization and treatment, and weakened the supervisory relationship) supervisor skills, techniques, and behaviors. Moreover, effective and ineffective behaviors, along with best and worst supervisors, were significantly differentiated based on the supervisory working alliance, supervisor style, supervisor self-disclosure, supervisee nondisclosure, and supervisee evaluation. Implications for supervision competencies and supervisor accountability are discussed.
- Gender differences between predictors of HIV status among PWID in Ukraine – Corrected Proof
- Extension and refinement of the predictive value of different classes of markers in ADNI: Four-year follow-up data – Corrected Proof
- Adverse events and dropouts in Alzheimer’s disease studies: What can we learn? – Corrected Proof
- Digital Participation at the Margins: Online Circuits of Rap Music by Portuguese Afro-Descendant Youth
- The Study on Evaluation and Improvement of Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Cancer by China’s Hospice Program
Category Specific RSS