• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Suicide Risk Among Transgender Adolescents and Young Adults: A Meta‐Analysis of Nearly One Million Participants

ABSTRACT

Background

Mental health disparities among transgender and gender diverse adolescents and young adults represent a critical public health concern. This meta-analysis examined suicidal risk among transgender youth compared to their cisgender peers.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed 29 studies published between 2015–2024, comprising nearly one million participants (957,163; 29,041 transgender and 928,122 cisgender). Random effects models were used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and prevalence estimates for suicidal ideation, planning, attempts, and completion.

Results

Transgender youth showed significantly higher prevalence of suicidal ideation (transmale: 52.2%, transfemale: 49.5% vs. cismale: 18.1%, cisfemale: 22.4%; p < 0.001) and attempts (48.0%–51.3% vs. 18.0%–22.0%; p < 0.001). Risk analyses revealed elevated risks for ideation (RR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.97–2.88), attempts (RR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.31–6.21), and completed suicide (RR = 4.80, 95% CI: 2.15–10.74). However, substantial heterogeneity was observed across all suicide outcomes (I2 > 90%), indicating that pooled estimates should be interpreted with caution. Publication bias assessment suggested potential overestimation of unadjusted effects, with trim-and-fill adjustment reducing the pooled risk estimate (adjusted RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08–1.45). No significant differences emerged between transmale and transfemale groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Overall, this meta-analysis documents markedly elevated suicidality among transgender adolescents and young adults, while emphasizing the need for cautious interpretation of aggregated effect sizes and further high-quality longitudinal research.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews on 06/30/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice