• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Experiences of working as early career allied health and medical practitioners in rural and remote environments: a qualitative systematic review protocol

Objective:

The objective of this review is to investigate the experiences of working as an early career allied health professional and doctor, and the factors that influence this experience in rural or remote environments.

Introduction:

Recruitment and retention of health professionals in rural and remote areas is challenging, with a range of strategies used to attract and retain them, which vary by profession and jurisdiction. Workforce recommendations are often based on the collective experience of all health professions. This review will explore the experiences of both groups and compare and synthesize the evidence in order to better understand the individual and collective factors to generate relevant recommendations.

Inclusion criteria:

This review will consider qualitative studies that include early career allied health professionals’ or doctors’ experiences of working in rural or remote areas and the personal and professional factors that impact on this experience.

Methods:

CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, Informit, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Google Scholar, and WorldWideScience.org will be searched to identify published and unpublished studies. Studies published since 2000 in English will be considered for the review. Identified studies will be screened for inclusion in the review by two independent reviewers. Studies for inclusion will be critically appraised by two independent reviewers. Data will be extracted using a standardized tool and reviewers will discuss any disagreements. Data synthesis will adhere to the meta-aggregative approach to categorize findings. The categories will be synthesized into a summary of synthesized findings that can be applied as evidence-based recommendations.

Systematic review registration number:

PROSPERO CRD42021223187

Corresponding: Chris Brebner, chris.brebner@flinders.edu.au

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

© 2021 Joanna Briggs Institute.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews on 06/19/2021 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice