• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Effectiveness of reduced- versus standard-dose radiotherapy on survival and radiation-associated toxicity in patients with human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol

Objective:

The objective of the review is to investigate overall survival in patients with human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ OPSCC) comparing standard- versus reduced-dose radiotherapy.

Introduction: The improved survival of patients with HPV+ compared to HPV− (HPV negative) OPSCC has raised the question regarding reducing the total radiation treatment dose delivered to patients with HPV+ OPSCC. A de-escalated radiotherapy protocol may provide equal oncological benefit with reduced adverse events/toxicity.

Inclusion criteria:

We will include any adult patients aged 18 years or older who have undergone curative intent treatment for HPV+ OPSCC. These patients can be of any stage at the time treatment is initiated. Exclusion criteria will include pre-clinical or animal-based studies, patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma lesions of the oropharynx, primary lesions in other head and neck sites, or if treatment is palliative in nature.

Methods:

A three-step search strategy will be conducted to identify relevant articles for inclusion through MEDLINE (PubMed and Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science, Scopus, and gray literature sources. These articles will be assessed against our inclusion and exclusion criteria at a title and abstract level, as well as at full-text level. Remaining studies will be critically appraised based on their trial design. Data extraction will occur for all studies and, where possible, will be pooled with statistical meta-analysis.

Systematic review registration number:

PROSPERO CRD42021252161

Correspondence: Timothy J. Lee, timothy.lee@sa.gov.au

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

© 2021 JBI

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews on 10/29/2021 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice