Abstract
Medical and demographic characteristics and psychological morbidity of individuals with cancer prior to a psychosocial intervention
can influence the efficacy of interventions. However, little is known about the moderating role of patients’ psychosocial
characteristics on intervention effects. This review sought to identify and synthesize the impacts of psychosocial moderators
of the effect of psychosocial interventions on the psychological well-being of cancer patients. A systematic review of the
published literature was conducted. Databases searched included PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science,
and Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection. Randomized controlled studies examining a moderator effect of patients’
psychosocial characteristics other than baseline depression and anxiety levels were included. Of 199 potential papers, a total
of 20 studies, involving 3,340 heterogeneous cancer patients are included. Of the 17 potential psychosocial moderators examined
in this review, 14 significantly moderated the effects of interventions. Moderators were categorized into personality traits,
mental and physical quality of life, social environment, and self-efficacy. Patients with poorer quality of life, interpersonal
relationships and sense of control benefitted more from interventions than those who already had adequate resources. Patients
with low levels of optimism and neuroticism, high levels of emotional expressiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, and dispositional
hypnotizability also showed greater benefits from various interventions. This review adds to the growing literature aimed
at personalizing psychosocial cancer treatment by identifying who benefits from which psychosocial interventions.
can influence the efficacy of interventions. However, little is known about the moderating role of patients’ psychosocial
characteristics on intervention effects. This review sought to identify and synthesize the impacts of psychosocial moderators
of the effect of psychosocial interventions on the psychological well-being of cancer patients. A systematic review of the
published literature was conducted. Databases searched included PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science,
and Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection. Randomized controlled studies examining a moderator effect of patients’
psychosocial characteristics other than baseline depression and anxiety levels were included. Of 199 potential papers, a total
of 20 studies, involving 3,340 heterogeneous cancer patients are included. Of the 17 potential psychosocial moderators examined
in this review, 14 significantly moderated the effects of interventions. Moderators were categorized into personality traits,
mental and physical quality of life, social environment, and self-efficacy. Patients with poorer quality of life, interpersonal
relationships and sense of control benefitted more from interventions than those who already had adequate resources. Patients
with low levels of optimism and neuroticism, high levels of emotional expressiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, and dispositional
hypnotizability also showed greater benefits from various interventions. This review adds to the growing literature aimed
at personalizing psychosocial cancer treatment by identifying who benefits from which psychosocial interventions.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-16
- DOI 10.1007/s10865-012-9398-0
- Authors
- Rie Tamagawa, Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Sheila Garland, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Marcus Vaska, Health Information Network Calgary, Holy Cross Site, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Linda E. Carlson, Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Journal Journal of Behavioral Medicine
- Online ISSN 1573-3521
- Print ISSN 0160-7715