• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

The Effects of Mindfulness Meditation: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract  

Previous meta-analyses on the effects of mindfulness meditation were predominantly concerned with clinical research. In contrast,
the present study aims at giving a comprehensive overview of the effects of mindfulness meditation on various psychological
variables, for meditators in nonclinical settings. Included are 39 studies that fulfilled our six selection criteria: (1)
a mindfulness meditation treatment, (2) the existence of an inactive control group, (3) a population of nonclinical adults,
(4) the investigation of psychological measures that were (5) assessed at temporal distance from a meditation session, and
(6) the availability of sufficient data to calculate effect sizes. The dependent variables examined included, among others,
attention, intelligence, self-attributed mindfulness, positive and negative emotions, emotion regulation, personality traits,
self-concept, self-realization, stress, and well-being. We found an effect size of


r
 
= 0.27

averaged across all studies and dependent variables. The effects differed widely across dependent variables. Moreover, we
found large differences between the effect sizes reported for complete Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR) programs
vs. “pure” meditation. MBSR seems to have its most powerful effect on attaining higher psychological well-being, whereas pure
mindfulness meditation studies reported the largest effects on variables associated with the concept of mindfulness. This
raises the question if some effect sizes found for MBSR might be partly inflated by effects that are not attributable to its
mindfulness meditation component. Future theorizing should address meditation-specific concepts more extensively to account
for the changes in healthy practitioners.

  • Content Type Journal Article
  • Category Review Paper
  • Pages 1-16
  • DOI 10.1007/s12671-012-0101-x
  • Authors
    • Juliane Eberth, Department of Psychology, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany
    • Peter Sedlmeier, Department of Psychology, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany
    • Journal Mindfulness
    • Online ISSN 1868-8535
    • Print ISSN 1868-8527
Posted in: Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews on 05/05/2012 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2023 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice