• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review

Abstract

Purpose  

To critically appraise and compare the measurement properties of the original versions of neck-specific questionnaires.

Methods  

Bibliographic databases were searched for articles concerning the development or evaluation of the measurement properties
of an original version of a self-reported questionnaire, evaluating pain and/or disability, which was specifically developed
or adapted for patients with neck pain. The methodological quality of the selected studies and the results of the measurement
properties were critically appraised and rated using a checklist, specifically designed for evaluating studies on measurement
properties.

Results  

The search strategy resulted in a total of 3,641 unique hits, of which 25 articles, evaluating 8 different questionnaires,
were included in our study. The Neck Disability Index is the most frequently evaluated questionnaire and shows positive results
for internal consistency, content validity, structural validity, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness, but a negative result
for reliability. The other questionnaires show positive results, but the evidence for each measurement property is mostly
limited, and at least 50% of the information on measurement properties per questionnaire is lacking.

Conclusions  

Our findings imply that studies of high methodological quality are needed to properly assess the measurement properties of
the currently available questionnaires. Until high quality studies are available, we recommend using these questionnaires
with caution. There is no need for the development of new neck-specific questionnaires until the current questionnaires have
been adequately assessed.

  • Content Type Journal Article
  • Pages 1-12
  • DOI 10.1007/s11136-011-9965-9
  • Authors
    • Jasper M. Schellingerhout, Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Arianne P. Verhagen, Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Martijn W. Heymans, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Bart W. Koes, Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Henrica C. de Vet, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Caroline B. Terwee, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Journal Quality of Life Research
    • Online ISSN 1573-2649
    • Print ISSN 0962-9343
Posted in: Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews on 07/10/2011 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice