Abstract
Trauma-informed care (TIC) has become a buzzword in many settings, including within and throughout the criminal legal system. Yet, studies show that while training and knowledge on TIC exist for justice workers, implementation is still greatly lacking. Additionally, as the U.S. found itself rapidly responding to a public health concern in 2020, courtrooms were not exempt. Many courtrooms across the U.S. then moved to a virtual setting in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Research and guidance on implementing TIC within virtual courtrooms were not well established at the time, and to this day, studies are still lacking in understanding best practices for TIC within virtual courtrooms and how these courts have since evolved. As such, the current study included courtroom observations within in-person and virtual courtroom settings for one metropolitan judicial district within a Midwestern state. Using validated TIC courtroom rubrics, alongside field observations, a case study is provided, comparing TIC practices in both courtroom modalities. The results suggest a lack of TIC practices and procedures in both settings, with slightly more TIC adherence occurring within the virtual setting. These findings further add to the lacking literature on current virtual courtroom operations and provide insight into areas for improvement across all courtroom modalities.