• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Socio‐Demographic Inequalities in COVID‐19 Health Care Access and Experiences in the United Kingdom: Intersectional and Mixed‐Methods Analyses of Open and Closed Questions in a Prospective Cohort Study

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Inequalities in health care access and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic have been observed along axes of social advantage. It is less well understood how access to care varied intersectionally with combinations of multiple social factors, and how social advantage shaped care experiences for COVID-19 illness.

Methods

We analysed responses to both closed (N = 3516) and open (N = 335) survey questions relating to health and social care access and experiences during the first two and a half years of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom community-based cohort, COVID Symptom Study Biobank. Causal effects of individual socio-demographic variables on access to health and social care were estimated with multivariable regression models, weighted for inverse probability of survey completion and adjusted for potential confounders. Associations between care access issues and social strata comprising combinations of sex, education level and local area deprivation were estimated using the intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) approach. Responses to open questions on health care experiences for COVID-19 illness were deductively coded and quantitatively analysed to estimate associations between socio-demographic advantage and various aspects of care experiences.

Results

Gradients in health and social care access along the lines of social advantage were observed in intersectional MAIHDA models, with the predicted probability of access issues highest for the stratum comprising female participants with lowest education and highest deprivation levels (42.9%, 95% CI: 31.9%–54.6%), and lowest for male participants with highest education and lowest deprivation (18.7%, 95% CI: 12.8%–26.7%). Socially disadvantaged participants also reported receiving poorer care for COVID-19, with lower likelihood of reporting receiving adequate care and specialist care for long COVID, and higher likelihood of negative experiences of care versus advantaged participants.

Conclusions

Inequalities in likelihood of health and social care access issues were observed, as well as inequalities in care experiences specifically for COVID-19, with issues accessing care and poorer experiences more likely to be reported by individuals with greater social disadvantage.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Open Access Journal Articles on 09/30/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice