• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Imagery Interventions and Cognitive‐Behavioural Therapy for Psychological Complaints Related to Bullying: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT

Bullying is associated with internalizing symptoms and impaired everyday functioning. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and imagery interventions have been studied as treatments to improve mental health after such experiences.

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of individual CBT and imagery interventions in targeting internalizing symptoms (negative affect, depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms) and improving self-perception and coping in bullying victims.

Systematic searches of PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase and Web of Science identified 23 studies applying CBT (n = 15) and imagery interventions (n = 8) in bullying victims. Risk of bias and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for pre – post and pre – follow-up comparisons. Sensitivity analyses and meta-regressions explored potential moderators.

Unadjusted analyses showed reductions in internalizing symptoms pre- to post – intervention (k = 21, g = 0.72). These symptoms were maintained at follow-up assessments (k = 9, g = 0.54). Similar initial improvements emerged for self-perception and coping outcomes (k = 15, g = 0.75). However, substantial heterogeneity existed (I
2 = 68%–98%). Crucially, after adjusting for publication bias, the pre–post internalizing effect dropped to g = 0.26 and was no longer statistically significant. Conversely, the adjusted effect for self-perception and coping increased to g = 0.98, whereas the follow-up internalizing effect decreased (g = 0.37) but remained significant.

Both CBT and imagery interventions may offer potential benefits for bullying victims in reducing internalizing symptoms and in improving self-perception and coping abilities. However, large heterogeneity, methodological limitations and publication bias warrant cautious interpretation. Further high-quality controlled trials are needed to establish the robustness and clinical efficacy of these interventions.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews on 10/02/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice