• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Tobacco-flavoured? Presence of descriptors and additives on Chinese e-cigarette packaging after a flavour ban

Background

Flavoured e-cigarettes are attractive to youth, and flavour descriptors on packaging can increase product appeal and reduce perceived risk. In October 2022, China banned non-tobacco-flavoured e-cigarettes and published a list of 101 permitted additives. We examined e-cigarette packs for the prevalence of flavour descriptors and additives approximately 6 months after the ban implementation.

Methods

Using a systematic protocol, we purchased 143 unique e-cigarette packs from six major Chinese cities in April–May 2023. Trained, native Chinese speakers coded flavour descriptors on packs (tobacco, non-tobacco, concept or none). Additive presence was determined from ingredient lists on the packs. Permitted additives were reviewed for flavouring properties. Prevalence of flavour descriptors and additives by flavour category was examined.

Results

Of 143 packs, 84 were manufactured after full enforcement of the flavour ban and included an ingredient list. Of these, 19% displayed tobacco descriptors, 48% concept descriptors and 33% both concept and tobacco descriptors. Forty-two per cent listed at least one permitted additive capable of imparting non-tobacco flavour (tobacco: 44%; concept: 30%; tobacco-plus-concept: 57%). Ethyl maltol (12%) and coffee extract (11%) were the most common additives, appearing in package ingredient lists in about one-third of tobacco-flavoured (31%) and tobacco-plus-concept descriptor (32%) packs. No packs featured a non-tobacco characterising flavour descriptor or listed any unpermitted additives.

Conclusions

Concept descriptors and flavouring additives are commonly listed on Chinese tobacco-flavoured e-cigarette packs, sustaining product appeal and undermining the flavour ban. Stricter regulations, such as a ban on concept descriptors, tighter additive restrictions and strengthened enforcement, could better protect public health.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 06/20/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice