• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Banning tobacco sales in supermarkets: an evaluation of compliance and tobacco availability near supermarkets in three Dutch cities

Introduction

The Netherlands implemented a supermarket tobacco sales ban on 1 July 2024. This study aimed to evaluate supermarkets’ compliance with the ban and potential unintended impacts on tobacco availability at tobacco points of sale (POS) in areas around supermarkets.

Methods

A longitudinal pre–post study was conducted in three Dutch cities: Amsterdam, Haarlem and Zwolle. In total, 114 supermarkets and their surrounding area (200 m radius buffer) were included. Data were collected in 2021 (pre-ban) and 2025 (post-ban). The study examined (1) supermarkets’ compliance with the tobacco sales ban and (2) change in the number of alternative POS, presence of alternative POS (yes/no) and distance to the closest alternative POS within the buffer. Poisson, logistic and linear generalised estimating equations models were applied.

Results

All included supermarkets complied with the ban. The number of alternative POS within 200 m of supermarkets was significantly lower post-ban, with an average reduction of 31% (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.77, p<0.001). The number of tobacco specialist shops increased, while other POS types (including other supermarkets) decreased. There was a non-significant reduction in the odds of an alternative POS being present around supermarkets (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.13, p=0.283) and an increase in average distance from the supermarket to the closest alternative POS (B=6.42 m, 95% CI –0.36 to 13.2, p=0.063).

Conclusion

After implementing the supermarket tobacco sales ban, there were fewer POS of tobacco around supermarkets in three Dutch cities, but this change did not demonstrably reduce availability within 200 m of supermarkets.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 02/27/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice