• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Examining the impact of Englands menthol cigarette ban on postban smoking cessation: longitudinal findings from the England arm of the 2020-2022 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys

Background

In May 2020, England banned menthol as a characterising flavour in cigarettes. However, the sale of menthol accessories (eg, filters, flavour cards) remains permitted. This study assessed the impact of England’s menthol ban on quit attempts and quit success.

Methods

Longitudinal data came from Waves 3 (2020, preban) and 4 (2022, postban) of the England arm of the International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. A nationally representative sample of 839 adults who smoke, were followed up, and provided sufficient data to derive menthol smoking (defined as smoking menthol cigarette brands/varieties) were included (n=112 smoked menthol, n=727 non-menthol, cigarettes preban). Logistic regressions examined associations between smoking menthol (vs non-menthol) preban and quit attempts and quit success postban. Menthol accessory use postban was also examined.

Results

At baseline (preban), 12.8% of adults who smoked used menthol (vs non-menthol) cigarettes, compared with 6.3% postban (AOR 0.46, 95% CI=0.30–0.69, p<0.001). Quit attempts were similar between participants who smoked menthol (vs non-menthol) preban (29.5% vs 27.0%; AOR 0.72, 95% CI=0.31–1.67). Quit success was higher among participants who smoked menthol (vs non-menthol) preban, although wide CIs included the possibility of no difference (20.1% vs 14.2%; AOR 1.25, 95% CI=0.56–2.79). Among those who smoked menthol cigarettes preban, 43.4% continued smoking menthol and 32.1% reported using menthol accessories postban.

Conclusions

While quit success was higher among participants who smoked menthol, small sample sizes and wide CIs limited the ability to detect associations. Continued menthol use and widespread accessory use suggest regulatory loopholes may be undermining the ban’s effectiveness.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 01/19/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice