Abstract
This mixed-methods study explores the experiences and perceptions of primary school students (aged 11–12) regarding English private tutoring (EPT) in rural Kazakhstan, addressing a significant gap in shadow education research concerning young people in underrepresented rural contexts. The study investigates the prevalence, motivations and perceived effectiveness of EPT, as well as its implications for educational equity in Central Asia. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire completed by 662 students across seven rural schools, followed by participatory methods involving group interviews and student-generated drawings with 42 students. Guided by EPT’s four dimensions (location, formality, locus of control and pedagogy), the analysis reveals that 33% of students participated in EPT, primarily to improve school performance and pursue long-term goals, such as studying abroad. While face-to-face EPT remained the most common format, online tutoring expanded significantly after the pandemic. Most students perceived EPT as more enjoyable and effective than regular schooling, particularly due to personalised instruction and the use of digital tools. However, the financial and emotional burden of EPT was evident among many families. The findings highlight persistent educational inequalities and emphasise the need for targeted policy interventions to enhance access to highly selective schools, regulate the private tutoring market and better understand the role of online tutoring in rural contexts.
Context and implications
Rationale for this study: Most research on private tutoring in Central Asia centres on urban settings. This mixed-methods study fills a key gap by exploring Grade 6 rural students’ experiences of English tutoring in Kazakhstan through survey and participatory methods that foreground children’s voices.
Why the new findings matter: Findings revealed that English private tutoring can enhance students’ self-confidence and aspirations, yet deepen inequities and burden families. By centring young people’s perspectives, the study provides insights often absent from shadow education debates, offering a more nuanced understanding of rural contexts.
Implications for policymakers, practitioners and researchers: For policymakers, the study underscores the urgency of regulating the shadow education market, expanding selective school access and reducing rural–urban disparities. For practitioners, it highlights children’s agency in shaping learning beyond school. For researchers, it demonstrates the value of participatory methods in capturing the perspectives of young learners.