• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Measurement invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) across age groups in a German representative sample: An application of confirmatory factor analysis using k-fold cross-validation.

Psychological Assessment, Vol 38(5), May 2026, 351-365; doi:10.1037/pas0001446

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is widely used to assess child and adolescent mental health. Ensuring measurement invariance (MI) across developmental stages is critical for valid comparisons. Previous studies have assessed MI across various demographic subgroups, but research on MI across age groups remains limited, particularly using rigorous methodological approaches. Using data from the representative German Motorik–Modul Study, we tested MI of the German version of the SDQ across four age groups (3–5, 6–10, 11–13, and 14–17 years). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis for ordinal responses using weighted least squares estimation evaluated the presence of configural, metric, scalar, and residual invariance. A five-factor model with two within-factor residual correlations provided the best fitting structure. Full metric and residual invariance were supported, while partial scalar invariance was established by freeing item intercepts for “worries,” “steals,” “restless,” and “distracted” in specific age groups. The k-fold cross-validation and the evaluation of the final invariant model in a holdout sample confirmed the robustness of the results. Findings support the use of the SDQ for age group comparisons while highlighting minor violations of MI in adolescence. These results underscore the importance of age-sensitive screening tools and suggest refining SDQ items and response scales to improve developmental risk assessment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved)

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 04/14/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice