• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Development and validation of the Goal Dimensions Questionnaire.

Motivation Science, Vol 12(3), Sep 2026, 293-317; doi:10.1037/mot0000405

Goals represent a central concept in the analysis of human motivation. How people evaluate their goals on dimensions like commitment or progress provides insight into motivational processes. Previously, however, goal dimension measures were often developed ad hoc and published without construct validation (Kiendl & Hennecke, 2022). To address this issue, we developed and factor-analyzed (Studies 1 and 2) the Goal Dimensions Questionnaire for measuring nine commonly investigated goal dimensions: commitment, demand, enjoyment, expectancy, external motivation, facilitation, progress, support, and value. In Study 1, goal expectancy, progress, and enjoyment accounted for about half the explained variance in the initial item set. We tested the construct validity of the Goal Dimensions Questionnaire in two longitudinal studies focusing on academic goals (Study 3) and New Year’s resolutions (Study 4). For academic goals, between-person analyses suggested that higher enjoyment, expectancy, and progress as well as lower demand predicted satisfaction with performance and better grades. In Study 4, within-person analyses using random intercept cross-lagged panel models revealed that support predicted life satisfaction 1 month later, and enjoyment was associated with it cross-sectionally. Cross-sectionally, enjoyment, expectancy, and progress were furthermore positively and demand was negatively associated with affective well-being on the within-person level. Exploratorily, commitment and expectancy consistently predicted goal progress. Recommendations for parsimonious measurement are derived through exploratory commonality analysis. Five of the nine scales showed many of the predicted associations supporting their validity. We recommend further validation of the external motivation, support, facilitation, and value dimensions in study contexts better tailored to their influence or expression. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved)

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 08/18/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice