• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Impact of the Unified Protocol on Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms, Cognitive Biases and Cognitive Insight in Patients at Ultra High Risk (UHR) for Psychosis: Secondary Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT

Background and Hypothesis

Ultra high risk (UHR) for psychosis can have different clinical trajectories but the remission rates are only 51.9% after 3 years of follow-up. Deficits in metacognition are associated with severity of symptoms and poor response to treatment. We hypothesize that the Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) will have a positive effect on attenuated psychotic symptoms, cognitive biases and cognitive insight in UHR individuals.

Study Design

This article reports the secondary analyses of a pilot randomized controlled trial with 36 UHR participants assigned to either an online group intervention with UP plus Treatment as Usual (UP + TAU) or TAU alone. Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-intervention and 3-month follow-up and included the severity and distress of attenuated psychotic symptoms (CAARMS), cognitive biases (CBQp) and cognitive insight (BCIS).

Study Results

Significant differences were found in the evolution of the two groups in CAARMS distress scores in favor of the UP condition group. Significant differences in CBQp scores between the two groups were found in the two time assessments in favor of the UP group. No significant differences were found in cognitive insight.

Conclusions

The UP intervention showed promising effects in reducing distress related to attenuated psychotic symptoms and cognitive biases, but not in improving cognitive insight. Given the small sample size, which fell below the initial target, and the pilot nature of the study, these findings should be interpreted with caution and considered preliminary until replicated in adequately powered trials.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 04/12/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice